LEGAL REALITIES OF PRE-INCORPORATION CONTRACTS UNDER CAMA 2020

  BEFORE THE COMPANY IS BORN: LEGAL REALITIES OF   PRE-INCORPORATION CONTRACTS UNDER CAMA 2020 FAOLA DIVINE BRIGHT AICMC   KEY ISSUES EXPLORED •        Introduction •        Definition of Pre-Incorporation Contract •        The Common Law Position on Pre-Incorporation Contracts •        Statutory Intervention •        Conclusion   INTRODUCTION In the dynamic landscape of Nigerian business law, the formation of a company marks a critical milestone, yet the journey often begins well before incorporation. Preincorporation contracts, entered into on behalf of a yet-to-be-formed company, play a pivotal role in laying the groundwork for future operations.   However, these agreements come with unique legal complexities, as they straddle the line between entrepreneurial ambition and statutory com...

MEANING, CLASSIFICATION AND SCOPE OF GOODS UNDER THE SALE OF GOODS ACT

 GOODS

Goods are the subject matter of a contract of sale without which there cannot be a contract of sale. Section 62(1) of the Sales of Goods Act defines goods to include;

“all chattel personal other than things in action and money…the term includes emblements, industrial growing crops and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.”

From this definition, the following deductions can be made: 

1. Personal chattels are included in the definition of goods while real chattels such as land are not included under the ambit of sales of goods. Personal chattels are tangible, movable properties and are distinct from chattels real which are immovable e.g buildings 

2. Emblements are vegetables or crops produce which are as a result of agricultural labour (fructus industriales) such as cocoa, cassava etc. It should be noted that where such produce are still attached to the land or forming part of the land, they cannot be a  subject matter of sales of goods unless they have been severed or agreed to  be severed from the land under the contract of sale. 

3. Land itself is excluded so also are buildings on it because it cannot be severed or removed from the land. However in modern times, there are movable houses that can be severed and transported from one location to another so it’s not entirely accurate to say all buildings are not severable. 

4. Things in action are excluded. This are personal rights to property that can only be claimed or enforcer by action and not by taking physical possession. Examples includes trademarks, promissory notes, shares etc. 

5. Sale of money is ask excluded. However if money is sold in coin, such may be excluded. That is such coin would pass as goods even not used as legal tender. For instance, melting of coins to reproduce other items.  

 

CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS

Generally speaking, Section 5 of the Sales of Goods Act specially defines the types of goods which may form the subject matter of a contract of sale;

1 Existing and future goods 

2 Specific goods (ascertained) and unascertained goods.  

  •  EXISTING GOODS 

These are goods owned and possessed by the seller at the time of entering into the contract or sale. They can be specific i.e. ascertained or unascertained. 

  • SPECIFIC/ASCERTAINED GOODS 

Subject to section 62(1) of the Sales of Goods Act, specific goods are defined as goods identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made. Their classification is significant, as it directly determines whether, and at what point, property and risk in the goods pass from seller to buyer. In Howell v. Coupland, the contract involved the sale of 200 tons of potatoes to be grown on a designated plot of land. Despite the goods not yet being harvested, the court held that they were specific goods. This was because the potatoes were clearly identified by their source, that is, the named land and the quantity was fixed. The specificity of both origin and amount meant the goods were ascertained at the time of contract, satisfying the legal threshold for specific goods under the Sales of Goods Act. 

  •  UNASCERTAINED GOODS 

These are goods that are not appropriated in a contract or identified by the parties at the time of entering the contract. It can be in three categories; generic goods, future goods and goods forming part of a larger bulk. Unascertained goods in most cases are defined by description so that once the supply meets the description, then the sellers obligation is discharged. For instance, a contract that involves sale of 5 Toyota cars in a motor garage where there are 50 identical Toyota cars remains unascertained goods until when the 5 Toyota cars are identified and appropriated from the larger bulk. In Re Wait, the contract invoked the sales of 500 tons of wheat out of the cargo of 1000 tons in the ship X-Challenger, the court held that the goods were unascertained.  

  •  FUTURE GOODS 

Future goods is a term used by the Sales of Goods Act to define goods that are not in existence or goods in existence but yet to be acquired by the seller at the time of the contract. Section 5(1) of the Sales of Goods Act refers to them as:

“goods to be manufactured or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract of sale.”

This provision covers not only goods that are yet to be manufactured but also existing goods that are not yet acquired by the seller. It can therefore be deduced that any person may sell or offer for sale goods which he is not the owner or in possession of but which he expects or hopes to own or acquire subsequently. Examples of future goods includes; a particular brand of car or machine to be made according to specification. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAW OF SALE OF GOODS IN NIGERIA: DEFINITION, CORE CHARACTERISTICS, GOVERNING REGIMES, AND DISTINCTIONS FROM SIMILAR COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS

ANALYZING NIGERIAN CITIZENSHIP: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF ITS CLASSIFICATION AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP